![]() We recommend you watch it:īeyond price, which clearly is the standout 'feature', the biggest other driver is simplicity of use. This <2 minute video gives a big picture overview of the Xeoma VMS. For more than that, it is interesting to see how they developed their UI to simplify the user experience, but likely unattractive for deployment. If you are looking for something simple that's inexpensive for home / small business use, Xeoma is worth considering. And while third party direct integration worked with multiple cameras (requires using exact Stream URL or 'Manufacture Auto Select' option), ONVIF did not (even though it was claimed). ![]() However, it has few, if any, advanced / professional feature. Xeoma is an easy to use, quick to get started VMS, among the easiest we have ever seen. Plus, the software is being actively developed every month. ![]() FelenaSoft's Xeoma charges no more than $19.95 per channel and under $10 per channel for 32 cameras ($299.95), down to a few dollars for hundreds of channels. so I would be also interested in opinions about the state of the software.VMS software for less than $3 per channel? Prices have certainly come down over the last few years, but a relative newcomer is pushing them even lower. this after everything was fine for over a year. I too have been frustrated, I feel like the last few nanoHD firmware releases really fucked over Samsung phones and I've had to turn off High Performance Devices and Auto-Optimize Network to get back a stable wifi connection on these devices. I know this device seemed to have a rough start and some of them were growing pains or user self inflicted issues when I read about them. Sure I can use the local address or VPN in from my phone or a PC if remote and use the local address, but eh.Īlso I would welcome opinions and anecdotes from folks who have a UDM Pro, especially IT folk just want to come home and not have "a second shift" at the house. so for me that's the deal breaker - I want that. It integrates with the app on the phone seamlessly. The remote access makes management easy and all the other ones are listed right there. A controller on a VM is sort of a pain in the ass sometimes. Any I'm thinking out loud and rambling about going it alone or doing an UDMPro. I don't have a desire for a network that needs the robustness of pfsense, I might try an extra VLAN for the IOT things. I'm getting old and I'm getting to the point where I just want something easy to manage at home. At the end of the day a single pane of glass is looking more appealing and as an infrastructure engineer responsible for 6 datacenters worldwide. I'm on the fence because, I could get a UDMPro for the house and call it a day or I could fuck with all the stuff I just listed and probably spend the same amount of money on different hardware and software and a lot of time researching and making it all work. I thought about doing Amcrest cameras and Xeoma/Blue Iris and I currently run pfsense on an old Watchguard but it's 32bit. I know it's aimed directly at businesses. I've really been on the fence about sticking with Ubiquiti, I think the pricing of the UXG-Pro is just not for me. I assume inside the UDMP controller you can setup an Admin for remote access just like on the stand alone controller and the cloud key controllers, correct? The three listed in the screenshot are the guest/BYOD WLAN at my job, the Wireless setup at our church, and the controller running on an Ubuntu VM here at my house. ![]() I know the device has it's own controller and cannot be adopted by another controller which was a huge gripe among folks, however does it still allow remote access using should you desire to set it up that way? I'm a little confused about the UDM Pro and how it works with external services offered by Ubiquiti. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |